1 | DVBCWPE5 ;BP-CIOFO/MM - REVIEW PTSD WORKSHEET TEXT ;3/27/2002
|
---|
2 | ;;2.7;AMIE;**43**;Apr 10, 1995
|
---|
3 | ;
|
---|
4 | ;
|
---|
5 | TXT ;
|
---|
6 | ;;E. Assessment of PTSD
|
---|
7 | ;;
|
---|
8 | ;; 1. state whether or not the veteran meets the DSM-IV stressor criterion
|
---|
9 | ;; 2. identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic symptoms
|
---|
10 | ;; veteran attributes to PTSD
|
---|
11 | ;; 3. describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
|
---|
12 | ;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
|
---|
13 | ;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
|
---|
14 | ;; 4. specify typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
|
---|
15 | ;;TOF
|
---|
16 | ;;F. Psychometric Testing Results
|
---|
17 | ;;
|
---|
18 | ;; 1. provide psychological testing if deemed necessary.
|
---|
19 | ;; 2. provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
|
---|
20 | ;; on a BVA Remand.
|
---|
21 | ;; 3. comment on validity of psychological test results
|
---|
22 | ;; 4. provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
|
---|
23 | ;; 5. state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
|
---|
24 | ;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
|
---|
25 | ;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
|
---|
26 | ;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
|
---|
27 | ;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
|
---|
28 | ;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
|
---|
29 | ;; 6. state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
|
---|
30 | ;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
|
---|
31 | ;; 7. describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
|
---|
32 | ;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
|
---|
33 | ;;
|
---|
34 | ;;G. Diagnosis:
|
---|
35 | ;;
|
---|
36 | ;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
|
---|
37 | ;; on the examination report.
|
---|
38 | ;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, delineate to the extent possible
|
---|
39 | ;; the symptoms associated with each and a discussion of relationship.
|
---|
40 | ;; 3. Evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
|
---|
41 | ;; occupational and social functioning.
|
---|
42 | ;;
|
---|
43 | ;;NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute, 38 U.S.C. 1110, from paying compensation
|
---|
44 | ;;for a disability that is a result of the veteran's own ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE.
|
---|
45 | ;;However, when a veteran's alcohol or drug abuse disability is secondary to
|
---|
46 | ;;or is caused or aggravated by a primary service-connected disorder, the
|
---|
47 | ;;veteran may be entitled to compensation. See Allen v. Principi, 237 F.3d
|
---|
48 | ;;1368, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Therefore, it is important to determine the
|
---|
49 | ;;relationship, if any, between a service-connected disorder and a disability
|
---|
50 | ;;resulting from the veteran's alcohol or drug abuse. Unless alcohol or drug
|
---|
51 | ;;abuse is secondary to or is caused or aggravated by another mental disorder,
|
---|
52 | ;;you should separate, to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or
|
---|
53 | ;;drug abuse from the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not
|
---|
54 | ;;possible to separate the effects in such cases, please explain why.
|
---|
55 | ;;
|
---|
56 | ;;H. Diagnostic Status
|
---|
57 | ;;
|
---|
58 | ;; Axis I disorders
|
---|
59 | ;; Axis II disorders
|
---|
60 | ;; Axis III disorders
|
---|
61 | ;; Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
|
---|
62 | ;; Axis V (GAF score - current)
|
---|
63 | ;;
|
---|
64 | ;;TOF
|
---|
65 | ;;I. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF):
|
---|
66 | ;;
|
---|
67 | ;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
|
---|
68 | ;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
|
---|
69 | ;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
|
---|
70 | ;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
|
---|
71 | ;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
|
---|
72 | ;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
|
---|
73 | ;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
|
---|
74 | ;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an explanation
|
---|
75 | ;; as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to alcohol or drug
|
---|
76 | ;; abuse.)
|
---|
77 | ;;
|
---|
78 | ;;J. Competency:
|
---|
79 | ;;
|
---|
80 | ;; Competency, for benefits purposes, has a special meaning,
|
---|
81 | ;; and refers ONLY to veterans' ability to manage benefit payments in their own
|
---|
82 | ;; best interests without restriction, and not to any other subject. State
|
---|
83 | ;; whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her or her benefit payments
|
---|
84 | ;; in the individual's own best interests (a physical disability which prevents
|
---|
85 | ;; the veteran from attending to financial matters in person is not a proper
|
---|
86 | ;; basis for a finding of incompetency unless the veteran is, by reason of that
|
---|
87 | ;; disability, incapable of directing someone else in handling the individual's
|
---|
88 | ;; financial affairs).
|
---|
89 | ;;
|
---|
90 | ;;K. Other Opinion:
|
---|
91 | ;;
|
---|
92 | ;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
|
---|
93 | ;; board or BVA remand (i.e., furnish the complete rationale and citation of
|
---|
94 | ;; medical texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review
|
---|
95 | ;; was undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
|
---|
96 | ;; on exam or testing please state WHY. If the requested opinion can not be
|
---|
97 | ;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
|
---|
98 | ;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "... is it at least as likely
|
---|
99 | ;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the opinion.
|
---|
100 | ;;
|
---|
101 | ;;L. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
|
---|
102 | ;;
|
---|
103 | ;; 1. Describe changes in PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONAL STATUS and QUALITY of LIFE
|
---|
104 | ;; since the last exam (performance in employment or schooling, routine
|
---|
105 | ;; responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical health,
|
---|
106 | ;; social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
|
---|
107 | ;; 2. Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
|
---|
108 | ;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
|
---|
109 | ;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific details
|
---|
110 | ;; about the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment are especially
|
---|
111 | ;; important.
|
---|
112 | ;;TOF
|
---|
113 | ;; 3. If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
|
---|
114 | ;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for
|
---|
115 | ;; impairment in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is not
|
---|
116 | ;; possible, explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD
|
---|
117 | ;; and clearly is a means of coping with PTSD symptoms).
|
---|
118 | ;; 4. If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
|
---|
119 | ;; and impairments in functional status.
|
---|
120 | ;; 5. Comment on whether veteran should be rated as competent for VA purposes
|
---|
121 | ;; in terms of being capable of managing his/her benefit payments in his/her
|
---|
122 | ;; own best interest.
|
---|
123 | ;;
|
---|
124 | ;;
|
---|
125 | ;;Signature: Date:
|
---|
126 | ;;END
|
---|