1 | DVBCWPD2 ;ALB/ESW PTSD WKS TEXT - 2 ; 10 Oct 2000
|
---|
2 | ;;2.7;AMIE;**34**;Apr 10, 1995
|
---|
3 | ;
|
---|
4 | ;
|
---|
5 | TXT ;
|
---|
6 | ;;
|
---|
7 | ;;F. Assessment of PTSD
|
---|
8 | ;;
|
---|
9 | ;; * state whether or not the veteran meets the DSM-IV stressor criterion
|
---|
10 | ;; * identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic change
|
---|
11 | ;; veteran attributes to stress exposure
|
---|
12 | ;; * describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
|
---|
13 | ;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
|
---|
14 | ;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
|
---|
15 | ;; * specify onset, duration, typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
|
---|
16 | ;;
|
---|
17 | ;;G. Psychometric Testing Results
|
---|
18 | ;;
|
---|
19 | ;; * provide psychological testing if deemed necessary.
|
---|
20 | ;; * provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
|
---|
21 | ;; on a BVA Remand.
|
---|
22 | ;; * comment on validity of psychological test results
|
---|
23 | ;; * provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
|
---|
24 | ;; * state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
|
---|
25 | ;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
|
---|
26 | ;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
|
---|
27 | ;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
|
---|
28 | ;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
|
---|
29 | ;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
|
---|
30 | ;; * state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
|
---|
31 | ;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
|
---|
32 | ;; * describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
|
---|
33 | ;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
|
---|
34 | ;;
|
---|
35 | ;;H. Diagnosis:
|
---|
36 | ;;
|
---|
37 | ;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
|
---|
38 | ;; on the examination report.
|
---|
39 | ;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, delineate to the extent possible
|
---|
40 | ;; the symptoms associated with each and a discussion of relationship.
|
---|
41 | ;; 3. Evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
|
---|
42 | ;; occupational and social functioning.
|
---|
43 | ;;
|
---|
44 | ;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute from paying compensation for a disability
|
---|
45 | ;; that is a result of the veteran's own ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE, whether based
|
---|
46 | ;; on direct service connection, secondary service connection, or aggravation
|
---|
47 | ;; by a service-connected condition. Therefore, when alcohol or drug abuse
|
---|
48 | ;; accompanies or is associated with another mental disorder, separate,
|
---|
49 | ;; to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or drug abuse from
|
---|
50 | ;; the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not possible
|
---|
51 | ;; to separate the effects, explain why.
|
---|
52 | ;;
|
---|
53 | ;;I. Diagnostic Status
|
---|
54 | ;;
|
---|
55 | ;; Axis I disorders
|
---|
56 | ;; Axis II disorders
|
---|
57 | ;; Axis III disorders
|
---|
58 | ;; Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
|
---|
59 | ;; Axis V (GAF score - current)
|
---|
60 | ;;
|
---|
61 | ;;J. Global Assessment or Functioning (GAF):
|
---|
62 | ;;
|
---|
63 | ;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
|
---|
64 | ;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
|
---|
65 | ;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
|
---|
66 | ;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
|
---|
67 | ;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
|
---|
68 | ;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
|
---|
69 | ;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
|
---|
70 | ;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an explanation
|
---|
71 | ;; as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to alcohol or drug
|
---|
72 | ;; abuse, the effects of which cannot be used to assess the effects of
|
---|
73 | ;; a service-connected condition.)
|
---|
74 | ;;
|
---|
75 | ;; DSM-IV is only for application from 11/7/96 on. Therefore, when applicable
|
---|
76 | ;; note whether the diagnosis of PTSD was supportable under DSM-III-R prior
|
---|
77 | ;; to that date.
|
---|
78 | ;;
|
---|
79 | ;;K. Competency:
|
---|
80 | ;;
|
---|
81 | ;; Competency, for benefits purposes, has a special meaning,
|
---|
82 | ;; and refers ONLY to veterans' ability to manage benefit payments in their own
|
---|
83 | ;; best interests without restriction, and not to any other subject. State
|
---|
84 | ;; whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her or her benefit payments
|
---|
85 | ;; in the individual's own best interests (a physical disability which prevents
|
---|
86 | ;; the veteran from attending to financial matters in person is not a proper
|
---|
87 | ;; basis for a finding of incompetency unless the veteran is, by reason of that
|
---|
88 | ;; disability, incapable of directing someone else in handling the individual's
|
---|
89 | ;; financial affairs).
|
---|
90 | ;;
|
---|
91 | ;;L. Other Opinion:
|
---|
92 | ;;
|
---|
93 | ;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
|
---|
94 | ;; board or BVA remand (furnish the complete rationale and citation of medical
|
---|
95 | ;; texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review was
|
---|
96 | ;; undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
|
---|
97 | ;; on exam or testing please state WHY. If the requested opinion can not be
|
---|
98 | ;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
|
---|
99 | ;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "... is it at least as likely
|
---|
100 | ;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the opinion.
|
---|
101 | ;;
|
---|
102 | ;;M. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
|
---|
103 | ;;
|
---|
104 | ;;- Describe changes in PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONAL STATUS and QUALITY of LIFE
|
---|
105 | ;; following trauma exposure (performance in employment or schooling, routine
|
---|
106 | ;; responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical health,
|
---|
107 | ;; social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
|
---|
108 | ;;- Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
|
---|
109 | ;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
|
---|
110 | ;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific details about
|
---|
111 | ;; the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment are especially
|
---|
112 | ;; important.
|
---|
113 | ;;- If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
|
---|
114 | ;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for impairment
|
---|
115 | ;; in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is not possible,
|
---|
116 | ;; explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD and clearly is a means
|
---|
117 | ;; of coping with PTSD symptoms).
|
---|
118 | ;;- If possible, describe pre-trauma risk factors or characteristics that may
|
---|
119 | ;; have rendered the veteran vulnerable to developing PTSD subsequent to trauma
|
---|
120 | ;; exposure.
|
---|
121 | ;;- If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
|
---|
122 | ;; and impairments in functional status.
|
---|
123 | ;;- Comment on whether veteran should be rated as competent for VA purposes
|
---|
124 | ;; in terms of being capable of managing his/her benefit payments in his/her
|
---|
125 | ;; own best interest.
|
---|
126 | ;;
|
---|
127 | ;;
|
---|
128 | ;;Signature: Date:
|
---|
129 | ;;END
|
---|