[613] | 1 | DVBCWPE2 ;ESW/ PTSD WKS TEXT - 2 ; 10 Oct 2000
|
---|
| 2 | ;;2.7;AMIE;**34**;Apr 10, 1995
|
---|
| 3 | ;
|
---|
| 4 | ;
|
---|
| 5 | TXT ;
|
---|
| 6 | ;;E. Assessment of PTSD
|
---|
| 7 | ;;
|
---|
| 8 | ;; * state whether or not the veteran meets the DSM-IV stressor criterion
|
---|
| 9 | ;; * identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic symptoms
|
---|
| 10 | ;; veteran attributes to PTSD
|
---|
| 11 | ;; * describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
|
---|
| 12 | ;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
|
---|
| 13 | ;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
|
---|
| 14 | ;; * specify typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
|
---|
| 15 | ;;TOF
|
---|
| 16 | ;;F. Psychometric Testing Results
|
---|
| 17 | ;;
|
---|
| 18 | ;; * provide psychological testing if deemed necessary.
|
---|
| 19 | ;; * provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
|
---|
| 20 | ;; on a BVA Remand.
|
---|
| 21 | ;; * comment on validity of psychological test results
|
---|
| 22 | ;; * provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
|
---|
| 23 | ;; * state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
|
---|
| 24 | ;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
|
---|
| 25 | ;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
|
---|
| 26 | ;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
|
---|
| 27 | ;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
|
---|
| 28 | ;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
|
---|
| 29 | ;; * state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
|
---|
| 30 | ;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
|
---|
| 31 | ;; * describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
|
---|
| 32 | ;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
|
---|
| 33 | ;;
|
---|
| 34 | ;;G. Diagnosis:
|
---|
| 35 | ;;
|
---|
| 36 | ;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
|
---|
| 37 | ;; on the examination report.
|
---|
| 38 | ;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, delineate to the extent possible
|
---|
| 39 | ;; the symptoms associated with each and a discussion of relationship.
|
---|
| 40 | ;; 3. Evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
|
---|
| 41 | ;; occupational and social functioning.
|
---|
| 42 | ;;
|
---|
| 43 | ;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute from paying compensation for a disability
|
---|
| 44 | ;; that is a result of the veteran's own ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE, whether based
|
---|
| 45 | ;; on direct service connection, secondary service connection, or aggravation
|
---|
| 46 | ;; by a service-connected condition. Therefore, when alcohol or drug abuse
|
---|
| 47 | ;; accompanies or is associated with another mental disorder, separate,
|
---|
| 48 | ;; to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or drug abuse from
|
---|
| 49 | ;; the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not possible
|
---|
| 50 | ;; to separate the effects, explain why.
|
---|
| 51 | ;;
|
---|
| 52 | ;;H. Diagnostic Status
|
---|
| 53 | ;;
|
---|
| 54 | ;; Axis I disorders
|
---|
| 55 | ;; Axis II disorders
|
---|
| 56 | ;; Axis III disorders
|
---|
| 57 | ;; Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
|
---|
| 58 | ;; Axis V (GAF score - current)
|
---|
| 59 | ;;
|
---|
| 60 | ;;I. Global Assessment or Functioning (GAF):
|
---|
| 61 | ;;
|
---|
| 62 | ;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
|
---|
| 63 | ;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
|
---|
| 64 | ;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
|
---|
| 65 | ;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
|
---|
| 66 | ;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
|
---|
| 67 | ;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
|
---|
| 68 | ;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
|
---|
| 69 | ;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an explanation
|
---|
| 70 | ;; as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to alcohol or drug
|
---|
| 71 | ;; abuse, the effects of which cannot be used to assess the effects of
|
---|
| 72 | ;; a service-connected condition.)
|
---|
| 73 | ;;
|
---|
| 74 | ;;J. Competency:
|
---|
| 75 | ;;
|
---|
| 76 | ;; Competency, for benefits purposes, has a special meaning,
|
---|
| 77 | ;; and refers ONLY to veterans' ability to manage benefit payments in their own
|
---|
| 78 | ;; best interests without restriction, and not to any other subject. State
|
---|
| 79 | ;; whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her or her benefit payments
|
---|
| 80 | ;; in the individual's own best interests (a physical disability which prevents
|
---|
| 81 | ;; the veteran from attending to financial matters in person is not a proper
|
---|
| 82 | ;; basis for a finding of incompetency unless the veteran is, by reason of that
|
---|
| 83 | ;; disability, incapable of directing someone else in handling the individual's
|
---|
| 84 | ;; financial affairs).
|
---|
| 85 | ;;
|
---|
| 86 | ;;K. Other Opinion:
|
---|
| 87 | ;;
|
---|
| 88 | ;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
|
---|
| 89 | ;; board or BVA remand (i.e.,furnish the complete rationale and citation of
|
---|
| 90 | ;; medical texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review
|
---|
| 91 | ;; was undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
|
---|
| 92 | ;; on exam or testing please state WHY. If the requested opinion can not be
|
---|
| 93 | ;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
|
---|
| 94 | ;; say so, and explain why. If the Opinion asks "... is it at least as likely
|
---|
| 95 | ;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the opinion.
|
---|
| 96 | ;;
|
---|
| 97 | ;;L. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
|
---|
| 98 | ;;
|
---|
| 99 | ;; 1. Describe changes in PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONAL STATUS and QUALITY of LIFE
|
---|
| 100 | ;; since the last exam (performance in employment or schooling, routine
|
---|
| 101 | ;; responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical health,
|
---|
| 102 | ;; social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
|
---|
| 103 | ;; 2. Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
|
---|
| 104 | ;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
|
---|
| 105 | ;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific details
|
---|
| 106 | ;; about the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment are especially
|
---|
| 107 | ;; important.
|
---|
| 108 | ;; 3. If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
|
---|
| 109 | ;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for
|
---|
| 110 | ;; impairment in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is not
|
---|
| 111 | ;; possible, explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD
|
---|
| 112 | ;; and clearly is a means of coping with PTSD symptoms).
|
---|
| 113 | ;;TOF
|
---|
| 114 | ;; 4. If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
|
---|
| 115 | ;; and impairments in functional status.
|
---|
| 116 | ;; 5. Comment on whether veteran should be rated as competent for VA purposes
|
---|
| 117 | ;; in terms of being capable of managing his/her benefit payments in his/her
|
---|
| 118 | ;; own best interest.
|
---|
| 119 | ;;
|
---|
| 120 | ;;
|
---|
| 121 | ;;Signature: Date:
|
---|
| 122 | ;;END
|
---|